Compare BMW 5 Series G30 LCI vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Volvo S40
Variants
520d
520d xDrive
520e
520i
530d
530d xDrive
530e
530e xDrive
530i
530i xDrive
540d xDrive
540i
540i xDrive
545e xDrive
M550i xDrive
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4969 mm / 195.6 in
Size | Width
1868 mm / 73.5 in
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
15 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2016-10-12
Facelift
2020-05-27
Made In
Germany, China, Austria, Thailand
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
64%
17%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Improved base engines
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Solid safety rating
Cons
- Too many electronics
- Stupid emission control systems
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Questionable design
- Not the best years of Volvo under Ford
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.