Compare BMW 5 Series G30 LCI vs Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM) vs Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

BMW 5 Series G30 LCI

Mazda 3 / Axela III (BM)

Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)

BMW 5 Series G30 LCIMazda 3 / Axela III (BM)Mazda 6 / Atenza II facelift (GH2)
Variants
520d
520d xDrive
520e
520i
530d
530d xDrive
530e
530e xDrive
530i
530i xDrive
540d xDrive
540i
540i xDrive
545e xDrive
M550i xDrive
1.5 Skyactiv-D
1.5 Skyactiv-D AT
1.5 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G
2.0 SkyActiv-G AT
2.0 Skyactiv-G Hybrid
2.2 SkyActiv-D
2.2 SkyActiv-D AT
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2D
2.2D
3.7 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score83%35%32%
Pros
  • Decent performance
  • Improved base engines
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Smart exterior and interior design
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Improved long-term reliability
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
Cons
  • Too many electronics
  • Stupid emission control systems
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Downgraded diesel engines
  • Exterior design becoming out of date

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.