Compare BMW 5 Series G30 LCI vs Volvo S90 vs Volvo S40

BMW | Cars

Volvo Cars | Cars

Variants

520d

520d xDrive

520e

520i

530d

530d xDrive

530e

530e xDrive

530i

530i xDrive

540d xDrive

540i

540i xDrive

545e xDrive

M550i xDrive

D3 Euro6

D3 Euro6d

D3 Euro6 AT

D3 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6

D4 Euro6d AT

D4 Euro6 AT

D4 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6 AWD AT

D5 Euro6d AWD AT

T4 Euro6 AT

T4 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2018

T5 Euro6d AT

T5 Euro6 AT 2017

T5 254PS AT

T6 Euro6d AWD AT

T6 Euro6 AWD

T6 Euro6 AWD AT

T8 AWD Hybrid

T8 AWD PHEV

1.6 105hp MT

1.6 105hp AT

1.6 109hp MT

1.8 115hp MT

1.8 115hp AT

1.8 122hp MT

1.8 GDI MT

1.9D 115hp MT

1.9D 102hp MT

1.9T MT

1.9T AT

1.9D 90hp MT

2.0 136hp MT

2.0 140hp MT

2.0 140hp AT

2.0T 160hp MT

2.0T 160hp AT

2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

500 L / 17.7 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

Double-wishbone

Wishbone

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Helical spring

Water Fording

250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

354.0 V

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Width

1868 mm / 73.5 in

Wheel Size

15 in

Wheelbase

2975 mm / 117.1 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

35.0 m / 114.8 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

82.0 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Displacement

2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Transmission | Gears

8-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic Steptronic

Production

Debut

2016-10-12

Facelift

2020-05-27

Made In

Germany, China, Austria, Thailand

Reviews

Neofiliac score

83%

70%

17%

Pros

Decent performance
Improved base engines
Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption

Elegant exterior design
Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
Superb offroad capabilities
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Solid safety rating

Cons

Too many electronics
Stupid emission control systems

Only available with small engines

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Questionable design
Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.