Compare BMW 5 Series G30 LCI vs Audi A6 C8 vs Volvo S90 facelift
Variants
520d
520d xDrive
520e
520i
530d
530d xDrive
530e
530e xDrive
530i
530i xDrive
540d xDrive
540i
540i xDrive
545e xDrive
M550i xDrive
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc, 322 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc, 320 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
14.1 kWh (gross)
11.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
354.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1457 mm / 57.4 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4939 mm / 194.4 in
4969 mm / 195.6 in
Size | Width
1868 mm / 73.5 in
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2924 mm / 115.1 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
7-speed / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
DCT / automatic
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2016-10-12
2018 Geneva Motor Show
Facelift
2020-05-27
Made In
Germany, China, Austria, Thailand
Germany, China, India
Reviews
Neofiliac score
83%
66%
64%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Improved base engines
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Good exterior styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Good suspension setup
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Too many electronics
- Stupid emission control systems
- Too many electronic gizmos
- Reliability concerns
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.