Compare Audi A3 8Y vs Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1) Hatchback (2013-2019)

Chrysler PT Cruiser Hatchback (2000-2010)

Audi | Cars

Skoda | Cars

Chrysler | Cars

Variants

30 g-tron DCT

30 TDI

30 TFSI

30 TFSI DCT

35 TDI DCT

35 TFSI

35 TFSI DCT

40 TFSI e DCT

45 TFSI e DCT

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 AT

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 86

1.2 TSI 90

1.2 TSI 90 DSG

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 AT

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 122 DSG

1.4 TSI 125 AT

1.4 TSI 125 DSG

1.4i 90

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 115

1.6 TDI 116

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.6i 110 Hp

1.6i 110 AT

1.6

2.0 141PS

2.0 141PS AT

2.0 150PS

2.0 150PS AT

2.2D 150PS

2.2D 121PS

2.4

2.4 AT

2.4T 182PS

2.4T 182PS AT

2.4T 220PS

2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.2 L / 6.6 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.7 L / 5.0 qt

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

57.0 L / 15.1 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.8 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

13.9 deg

16.5 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

13.0 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

134 mm / 5.3 in

Size | Length

4343 mm / 171.0 in

Size | Width

1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)

1706 mm / 67.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

74.5 mm / 2.9 in

Production

Availability

2020

Debut

2020-03

Reviews

Neofiliac score

41%

Pros

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Athletic styling

Low official fuel consumption

So ugly that it's an icon

Cons

Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

Can't even reach 200km/h
No powerful engine options
Not independent rear suspensions
Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.