Compare Audi A3 8Y vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Lexus CT 200h
Variants
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
Euro6
Euro5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
12.8 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Length
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4368 mm / 172.0 in
Size | Width
1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2020-03
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
17%
31%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Athletic styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Poorly built
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.