HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi A3 8Y vs Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Skoda Fabia 4

Variants
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122 DSG
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.4i 90
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DSG
1.6i 110 Hp
1.6i 110 AT
1.0 MPI 65
1.0 MPI 80
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 95

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1190 L / 42.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
14.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.9 deg
16.5 deg
17.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Threaded twist beam
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
134 mm / 5.3 in
138 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1459 mm / 57.4 in
Size | Length
4343 mm / 171.0 in
4108 mm / 161.7 in
Size | Width
1816 mm / 71.5 in | 1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1706 mm / 67.2 in
1780 mm / 70.1 in | 1954 mm / 76.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1509.0 mm / 59.4 in
Wheelbase
2564 mm / 100.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.278 ~ 0.315

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 AP
Engine | Bore
74.5 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Production

Availability
2020
2021
Debut
2020-03

Reviews

Neofiliac score
41%
8%
6%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Athletic styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Very poor performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Very basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.