Compare Audi A3 Sportback (8Y) vs Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247 vs Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

Audi A3 Sportback (8Y)

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247

Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203

Audi A3 Sportback (8Y)Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247Mercedes-Benz CLC CL203
Variants
30 g-tron DCT
30 TDI
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TFSI e DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score41%27%31%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Athletic styling
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
  • RWD remained
  • Slight interior improvements
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian
  • Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Cheaply put together

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.