Compare Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W167 vs Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W167

Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253

Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class W167Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class X253Mercedes-Benz GLA H247
Variants
AMG GLE 53
AMG GLE 63
AMG GLE 63 S
GLE 300d
GLE 350d
GLE 350de
GLE 400d
GLE 450
GLE 580
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
AMG GLA 35 4MATIC
AMG GLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 45 S 4MATIC+
GLA 180
GLA 180d
GLA 200
GLA 200 4MATIC
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC
GLA 220d
GLA 220d 4MATIC
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC
GLA 250e

Reviews

Neofiliac score79%60%32%
Pros
  • Great performance
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Great V8 in the 63AMG models
  • Cleaner exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent interior quality
Cons
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Most engines are lethargic
  • Fuel-cell not widely available
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.