Compare Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Mercedes CLC CL203 vs BMW 1 Series F20 LCI
Variants
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT
116d
116d EfficientDynamics
116d AT
116i
118d
118d AT
118d xDrive
118i
118i AT
120d
120d AT
120d xDrive AT
120i N13
120i N13 AT
120i B48
120i B48 AT
125d AT
125i N20
125i N20 AT
125i B48 AT
M135i
M135i AT
M135i xDrive AT
M140i
M140i AT
M140i xDrive AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
360 L / 12.7 cu-ft ~ 1200 L / 42.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
52.0 L / 13.7 gal
Passengers
5
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Performance
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Production
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
31%
82%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Better-looking than before
- RWD remained
- Slight interior improvements
- Glorious B58 engine + RWD + Manual
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved styling
- Much improved drivetrain reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
- Utilitarian
- Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Cheaply put together
- MacPherson front suspension
- Not as good-looking as the F21
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.