Compare Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Mercedes CLC CL203 vs BMW 1 Series E87 LCI
Variants
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
CLC 160
CLC 160 AT
CLC 180 Kompressor
CLC 180 Kompressor AT
CLC 200 CDI
CLC 200 CDI AT
CLC 200 Kompressor
CLC 200 Kompressor AT
CLC 220 CDI
CLC 220 CDI AT
CLC 230
CLC 230 AT
CLC 250
CLC 250 AT
CLC 350
CLC 350 AT
116d
116i
116i 2009+
116i AT
116i AT 2009+
118d
118d AT
118i
118i AT
120d
120d AT
120i
120i AT
123d
123d AT
130i
130i AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
330 L / 11.7 cu-ft ~ 1150 L / 40.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
4
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1562 mm / 61.5 in
1405 mm / 55.3 in
1421 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4419 mm / 174.0 in
4239 mm / 166.9 in
Track Width | Front
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
1484.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1476.0 mm / 58.1 in
1497.0 mm / 58.9 in
Wheelbase
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Production
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show
Reviews
Neofiliac score
27%
31%
51%
Pros
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Better-looking than before
- RWD remained
- Slight interior improvements
- Slightly more modern styling
- Up-rated engines
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
- Utilitarian
- Arguably less appealing than its predecessor
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Cheaply put together
- Introduction of unreliable N54 and N47 engines
- N47 made diesel a no-no for the E87
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.