Compare Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169 vs Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ)

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169

Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ)

Mercedes-Benz B-Class W247Mercedes-Benz A-Class W169Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ)
Variants
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score27%1%26%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
  • Three-pointed star
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.