Compare Audi A6 C8 (4K) vs Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) vs Audi A5 Sportback B9 (8W6) facelift

Audi A6 C8 (4K)

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX)

Audi A5 Sportback B9 (8W6) facelift

Audi A6 C8 (4K)Skoda Octavia 4 (NX)Audi A5 Sportback B9 (8W6) facelift
Variants
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
35 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TFSI MT
40 g-tron
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI
40 TFSI
40 TFSI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI Euro6d quattro
45 TFSI quattro
50 TDI quattro

Reviews

Neofiliac score66%37%68%
Pros
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good suspension setup
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Too many electronic gizmos
  • Reliability concerns
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather complex
  • Too many electronics

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.