Compare Audi A6 C8 vs DS 9 vs Saab 9-5 II
Variants
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
225 PS
225 PS E-TENSE
250 PS E-TENSE
360 PS E-TENSE 4x4
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.8T XWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft
513 L / 18.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
455 kg / 1003 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
14.1 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Platform
GM Epsilon II LWB
Dimensions
Size | Height
1457 mm / 57.4 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4939 mm / 194.4 in
4934 mm / 194.3 in
5009 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
2113 mm / 83.2 in
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1566.0 mm / 61.7 in
Weight
1885.0 kg / 4155.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2924 mm / 115.1 in
2895 mm / 114.0 in
2837 mm / 111.7 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine
EP6FDT
Engine | Bore
77.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.2:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.5 cu-in / 1598.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed / 8-speed
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT / automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2011
Debut
2018 Geneva Motor Show
Made In
Germany, China, India
Reviews
Neofiliac score
66%
57%
35%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Good suspension setup
- Low official fuel consumption for lower tax
- Rather good interior
- Styling ahead of its time
- Good fit and finish
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good appointments inside
Cons
- Too many electronic gizmos
- Reliability concerns
- Only available with a tiny engine
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bland styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.