Compare Audi A6 C8 vs Audi A8 D5 vs Lexus LS 4 facelift
Variants
35 TDI
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
50 TDI
50 TDI Euro6d
50 TDI Euro6d LWB
50 TDI LWB
55 TFSI
55 TFSI Euro6d
55 TFSI Euro6d LWB
55 TFSI LWB
60 TDI
60 TDI LWB
60 TFSI
60 TFSI LWB
60 TFSI e
60 TFSI e LWB
LS 460
LS 460 AWD
LS 460L
LS 600h
LS 600h L
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
84.0 L / 22.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
14.1 kWh (gross)
14.1 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Size | Height
1457 mm / 57.4 in
1485 mm
Size | Length
4939 mm / 194.4 in
5172 mm SWB / 5302 mm LWB
Size | Width
1886 mm / 74.3 in | 2110 mm / 83.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1945 mm / 76.6 in | 2130 mm / 83.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1875 mm / 73.8 in
Track Width | Front
1630.0 mm / 64.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2924 mm / 115.1 in
2998 mm SWB / 3128 mm LWB
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.7 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.4 sec
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.8:1
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
7-speed / 8-speed
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT / automatic
Automatic ZF 8HP
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2012
Debut
2018 Geneva Motor Show
2017 Frankfurt Auto Show
Made In
Germany, China, India
Germany
Reviews
Neofiliac score
66%
75%
87%
Pros
- Good exterior styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Good suspension setup
- Tremendous torque from the 60 TDI and 60 TFSI
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- 60 TFSI e with low fuel consumption rating for those who don't like paying taxes
- Slightly better styling, esp. in Sport guise
- Improved suspension durability
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Robust powertrain
Cons
- Too many electronic gizmos
- Reliability concerns
- Styling even more generic than before
- No more W12
- Questionable long-term reliability and repair-ability
- Car with gadgets or gadgets masquerading as car?
- Starting to be down on power compared to its European competition
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.