Compare Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Kia Soul
Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
410 kg / 904 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
195/65R15
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4105 mm / 161.6 in
Size | Width
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
Performance
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2014
Debut
2018-07-25
Made In
Hungary, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
27%
14%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good marketing
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Distinct styling
Cons
- Impractical and ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.