Compare Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Nissan Pathfinder 4 vs Nissan Qashqai 3
Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
3.5
3.5 260
3.5 260 AWD
3.5 AWD
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
74.0 L / 19.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
14.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
16.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
22.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
178 mm / 7.0 in
Size | Height
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1669.0 mm / 65.7 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1669.0 mm / 65.7 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 18, 7.5J x 20
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2901 mm / 114.2 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
LEV2 ULEV
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
CVT
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2018-07-25
2021-02-18
Made In
Hungary, China
UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
28%
3%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good marketing
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Cheap to buy
Cons
- Impractical and ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible CVT
- Very ugly
- Horrible build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Only available with tiny engines
- Waste of raw materials
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.