Compare Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Audi Q7 II vs Volvo XC90 II facelift

Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
B5 235
B5 235 6-7 Seat
B5 250
B5 250 7 Seat
B6
B6 6-7 Seat
Recharge T8
T5
T5 7 Seat
T6
T6 6-7 Seat
T8 4 Seat
T8 6-7 Seat

Capacity

Passengers
5
5 / 7
Payload
723 kg / 1594 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Tire Size
235/55 R19, 275/45 R20, 275/35 R22
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
450 mm / 17.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
17.3 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
223 mm / 8.8 in
Size | Height
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4953 mm / 195.0 in
Size | Width
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
Weight
2227.0 kg / 4909.7 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Debut
2018-07-25
Made In
Hungary, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
74%
67%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Great comfort
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Reliability concerns

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.