HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Renault Captur vs Renault Koleos

Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 173 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4
2.5 170
2.5 170 4x4
2.5 170 4x4 CVT
2.5 170 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1380 L / 48.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Size | Length
4122 mm / 162.3 in
4520 mm / 178.0 in
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Debut
2018-07-25
Made In
Hungary, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
1%
23%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Relatively adequate engines
Cons
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.