HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi Q3 Sportback F3 vs Citroen C4 Cactus vs Citroen C5 Aircross

Variants
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.2 e-THP 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS AT
1.2 PureTech 75PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS AT
1.6 e-HDI 92PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
348 L / 12.3 cu-ft ~ 1170 L / 41.3 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.7 deg
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Platform
PSA PF1

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
230 mm / 9.1 in
Size | Height
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4157 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1729 mm / 68.1 in | 1946 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2595 mm / 102.2 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
10.5:1

Production

Availability
2014 ~ 2017
Debut
2018-07-25
Made In
Hungary, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
3%
15%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.