Compare Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 5 (WL) vs Volvo XC90 II

Land Rover Defender 110 (L663)

Jeep Grand Cherokee 5 (WL)

Volvo XC90 II

Land Rover Defender 110 (L663)Jeep Grand Cherokee 5 (WL)Volvo XC90 II
Variants
D200
D200 3.0
D240
D250
D300
P300
P400
P400e
P525
2.0 4xe
3.6 Pentastar 290
3.6 Pentastar 290 AWD
3.6 Pentastar 293
3.6 Pentastar 293 4WD
5.7 Hemi 364 4WD
5.7 Hemi 364 4WD
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score86%73%70%
Pros
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Down to very low 2.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent styling
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Large interior space
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • PHEV nonsense
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • Large turning circle
  • Reliability concerns
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.