Compare Land Rover Defender 110 (L663) vs Jeep Wrangler 4 Unlimited (JL) vs Volvo XC90 II

Land Rover Defender 110 (L663)

Jeep Wrangler 4 Unlimited (JL)

Volvo XC90 II

Land Rover Defender 110 (L663)Jeep Wrangler 4 Unlimited (JL)Volvo XC90 II
Variants
D200
D200 3.0
D240
D250
D300
P300
P400
P400e
P525
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Rubicon PHEV 4xe
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.0 Rubicon EcoDiesel
3.0 Sport EcoDiesel
6.4 Rubicon 392 V8
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score86%88%70%
Pros
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Down to very low 2.8L/100km fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Iconic styling
  • Large V8 available
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Body-on-frame
  • Solid axle
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • PHEV nonsense
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • Large turning circle
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Low build quality
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.