Compare Volkswagen Golf 8 vs Kia Rio 4 facelift vs Kia Rio III 3-door
Variants
1.0 eTSI 110 DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 TSI 204 eHybrid DSG
1.5 eTSI 130 DSG
1.5 eTSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
GTD DSG
GTE DSG
GTI
GTI Clubsport DSG
GTI DSG
R 4MOTION DSG
1.0 T-GDI 101
1.0 T-GDI 101 DCT
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.0 T-GDI 120 DCT
1.2 84
1.1 CRDi
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
325 L / 11.5 cu-ft ~ 1103 L / 39.0 cu-ft
288 L / 10.2 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
43.0 L / 11.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
185/65 R15, 195/55 R16, 205/45 R17
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1455 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4050 mm / 159.4 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in | 1993 mm / 78.5 in (mirror unfolded)
1720 mm / 67.7 in | 1985 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1512.0 mm / 59.5 in
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1511.0 mm / 59.5 in
Wheel Size
5.5J x 15, 6.0J x 16, 6.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.275
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
71.0 mm / 2.8 in
Production
Availability
2020
2020
2012 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
70%
17%
22%
Pros
- Rather good styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good handlding characteristics
- Small turning circle
- Decent styling
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible performance
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Low build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.