Compare BMW 3 Series G20 vs Skoda Octavia 4 (NX) vs Peugeot 508

BMW 3 Series G20

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX)

Peugeot 508

BMW 3 Series G20Skoda Octavia 4 (NX)Peugeot 508
Variants
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320i AT
320i xDrive AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i AT
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.6 e-HDi 115 6MT
1.6 HDi 115 5MT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
2.2 HDi 204 AT
HYbrid4
THP 155 6MT
THP 155 AT
VTi 120

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%37%16%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Closed-deck engines
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design
  • Unreliable Hybrid nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.