Compare BMW 3 Series G20 vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Volvo S40

BMW | Cars

Volvo Cars | Cars

Variants

318d

318d AT

318i AT

320d

320d AT

320d xDrive AT

320e AT

320i AT

320i xDrive AT

330d AT

330d xDrive AT

330e AT

330e xDrive AT

330i AT

330i xDrive AT

M340d xDrive AT

M340i AT

D3 MT

1.6 105hp MT

1.6 105hp AT

1.6 109hp MT

1.8 115hp MT

1.8 115hp AT

1.8 122hp MT

1.8 GDI MT

1.9D 115hp MT

1.9D 102hp MT

1.9T MT

1.9T AT

1.9D 90hp MT

2.0 136hp MT

2.0 140hp MT

2.0 140hp AT

2.0T 160hp MT

2.0T 160hp AT

2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

461 L / 16.3 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

5.6 L / 5.9 qt

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Disc, 322 mm

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc, 320 mm

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Double-wishbone

Wishbone

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Helical spring

Turning Circle

11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Water Fording

250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.0 kWh (gross)

11.6 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

354.0 V

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

156 mm / 6.1 in

Size | Height

1446 mm / 56.9 in

Size | Length

4969 mm / 195.6 in

Size | Width

1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1617.0 mm / 63.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1618.0 mm / 63.7 in

Wheel Size

17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in

15 in

Wheelbase

2941 mm / 115.8 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

35.0 m / 114.8 ft

Coefficient Of Drag

0.26 ~ 0.29

Electric Range

51.0 km / 31.7 mi

Top Speed

180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

82.0 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Displacement

2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

93.2 mm / 3.7 in

Production

Availability

2020

Made In

Germany, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand

Reviews

Neofiliac score

68%

64%

17%

Pros

Decent styling
Closed-deck engines
Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption

Overall good styling
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Good towing capacity

Solid safety rating

Cons

MacPherson strut front suspensions

Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
Only available with small engines
Unreliable

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Questionable design
Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.