Compare BMW 3 Series G20 vs Audi A7 C8 (4K8) Sportback vs Skoda Octavia 4 (NX)

BMW 3 Series G20

Audi A7 C8 (4K8) Sportback

Skoda Octavia 4 (NX)

BMW 3 Series G20Audi A7 C8 (4K8) SportbackSkoda Octavia 4 (NX)
Variants
318d
318d AT
318i AT
320d
320d AT
320d xDrive AT
320e AT
320i AT
320i xDrive AT
330d AT
330d xDrive AT
330e AT
330e xDrive AT
330i AT
330i xDrive AT
M340d xDrive AT
M340i AT
40 TDI
40 TDI quattro
45 TDI quattro
45 TFSI
45 TFSI quattro
45 TFSI ultra
45 TFSI ultra quattro
50 TDI quattro
50 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI e quattro
55 TFSI quattro
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS

Reviews

Neofiliac score68%67%37%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Closed-deck engines
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good performance
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
Cons
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Uglier than the A6
  • Impractical
  • Sold with small engines
  • Too many electronic gizmos
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.