Compare Volvo V60 II Cross Country vs Volvo V60 II vs Porsche Panamera 971 Sport Turismo facelift

Variants
B5
D3
D4
T5
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
Panamera 4
Panamera 4 E-Hybrid
Panamera 4S
Panamera 4S E-Hybrid
Panamera GTS
Panamera Turbo S
Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Integral axle with transverse leaf spring
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.9 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1499 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4784 mm / 188.3 in
4761 mm / 187.4 in
5049 mm / 198.8 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1937 mm / 76.3 in | 2165 mm / 85.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1621.0 mm / 63.8 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2950 mm / 116.1 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
0.29
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2200 kg / 4850 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
AW TG-81 SC automatic
Automatic PDK

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2018-02
Made In
Sweden; Belgium; Malaysia

Reviews

Neofiliac score
46%
62%
91%
Pros
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Best performance in class
  • Superb styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Well built
Cons
  • Low top speed
  • Only available with small engines
  • Black plastic BS
  • Only available with small engines
  • Too complex
  • No RWD

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.