Compare Jeep Wrangler 4 Unlimited (JL) vs Land Rover Range Rover 3 (L322) vs Volvo XC90 II

Jeep Wrangler 4 Unlimited (JL)

Land Rover Range Rover 3 (L322)

Volvo XC90 II

Jeep Wrangler 4 Unlimited (JL)Land Rover Range Rover 3 (L322)Volvo XC90 II
Variants
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Rubicon PHEV 4xe
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.0 Rubicon EcoDiesel
3.0 Sport EcoDiesel
6.4 Rubicon 392 V8
3.0 TD6
3.6 TDV8
4.2 V8 Supercharged
4.4 V8 299
4.4 V8 306
4.4 TDV8
4.4 V8 286
5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged Euro5
5.0 V8 Supercharged
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score88%83%70%
Pros
  • Iconic styling
  • Large V8 available
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Body-on-frame
  • Solid axle
  • Continually improved drivetrain
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Low build quality
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • Many reliability issues with the drivetrain
  • Horrible electrical problems
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.