Compare Tesla Model Y vs Toyota RAV4 EV 2 vs Toyota Venza AV10
Variants
Long Range AWD
Performance AWD
Standard Range
2.7
2.7 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
3.5
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD
3.5 AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
1926 L / 68.0 cu-ft
1031 L / 36.4 cu-ft ~ 2067 L / 73.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
67.0 L / 17.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
441 kg / 972 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Independent, spring
Tire Size
225/65 R17
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 41.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
386.0 V
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Crossover
5-door battery-electric SUV
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
Toyota K
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
167 mm / 6.6 in
150 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1624 mm / 63.9 in
1684 mm / 66.3 in
1610 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4750 mm / 187.0 in
4575 mm / 180.1 in
4801 mm / 189.0 in
Size | Width
1920 mm / 75.6 in | 2129 mm / 83.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1978 mm / 77.9 in (mirror folded)
1816 mm / 71.5 in
1905 mm / 75.0 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1631.0 mm / 64.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Weight
1829.0 kg / 4032.3 lbs
1835.0 kg / 4045.5 lbs
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2890 mm / 113.8 in
2659 mm / 104.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.0 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.23
0.30
Top Speed
160.0 km/h / 99.4 mph
Towing Capacity
1588 kg / 3501 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ZEV
Engine | Bore
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Power
275 hp / 205.1 kW
154 hp / 114.8 kW
Engine | Stroke
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2014
2008 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
12%
24%
Pros
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Good range
- Decent performance
- High cargo capacity
- Decent performance
- Rather good exterior design (for what it is)
- Exceptionally reliable powertrain
- Great fit and finish
Cons
- Rather ugly
- Greenwashing
- Highly unreliable
- Electronic gimmicks
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Horrible electric range
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Half crossover, half station wagon
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.