Compare Tesla Model S facelift vs Skoda Superb 3 facelift vs Honda Clarity

Variants
100D
60
60D
70
70D
75
75D
90D
Long Range
P100D
P90D
P90D AWD
Performance
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
Fuel Cell
Plug-in Hybrid
Electric

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
745 L / 26.3 cu-ft ~ 1645 L / 58.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
26.0 L / 6.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double wishb
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/45 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
100 kWh
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door battery-electric Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1445 mm / 56.9 in
1478 mm / 58.2 in
Size | Length
4980 mm
4869 mm / 191.7 in
4895 mm / 192.7 in
Size | Width
1964 mm
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1877 mm / 73.9 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Weight
1961 - 2250 kg
Wheel Size
19"; 21" (optional)
8J x 18
Wheelbase
2960 mm
2751 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
Fuel Economy
5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (combined) | 5.3 L/100km / 44.4 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Dual motor AWD
Engine | Bore
73.0 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.5 L / 91.4 cu-in / 1498.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
89.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Torque
134 Nm / 98.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm + 315 Nm / 232.3 lb-ft @ 0-2000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
1-speed
1-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Debut
2012-06-22
Made In
US: California; EU: Netherlands

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
42%
50%
Pros
  • Down to exceptional 2.5s 0-100kph time
  • Up to 598hp of power
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Distinct styling
  • Fuel cell
Cons
  • Lots of reliability issues
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Not meant for volume production
  • Lack of fuel cell infrastructure

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.