Compare Audi TTS FV/8S Roadster vs BMW Z3 M Roadster vs Audi TT (8J) Roadster
Variants
TTS 7DCT
TTS MT
TTS 6DCT
S50
S54
1.8 TFSI
1.8 TFSI Euro5
1.8 TFSI DCT
2.0 TDI quattro
2.0 TDI quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200
2.0 TFSI 200 Euro5 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 200 DCT
2.0 TFSI 211
2.0 TFSI 211 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI 211 DCT
3.2 quattro
3.2 quattro DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft
165 L / 5.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.1 L / 10.7 qt
10.8 L / 11.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
320 kg / 705 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Size | Height
1345 mm / 53.0 in
1358 mm / 53.5 in
Size | Length
4025 mm / 158.5 in
Size | Width
1832 mm / 72.1 in | 1966 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1422.0 mm / 56.0 in
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1492.0 mm / 58.7 in
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheel Size
8.5J x 18
17 in
Wheelbase
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2468 mm / 97.2 in
Performance
Fuel Economy
16.6 L/100km / 14.2 MPG (urban) | 7.9 L/100km / 29.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
58%
66%
71%
Pros
- Decent engine for an I4
- Good engines
- Simple to work on
- No BS driving experience
- Decent engine reliability
- Manual widely available
- Interesting VR6 engine
- Decent handling
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very little cargo space
- Heavier than the MX-5 and handles worse (but much more expensive)
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Average looks with the top up
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.