Compare Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232 vs Mercedes-Benz SL R230 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232

Mercedes-Benz SL R230 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift

Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232Mercedes-Benz SL R230 faceliftMercedes-Benz CLK A209 facelift
Variants
SL 55 4MATIC+
SL 63 4MATIC+
SL 55 AMG
SL 65 AMG
SL 350
SL 500
SL 600
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163 MT
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 MT
CLK 280 MT
CLK 320 CDI MT
CLK 350
CLK 500 M113
CLK 500 M273

Reviews

Neofiliac score88%90%71%
Pros
  • Rather good performance
  • Decent styling
  • Good handling
  • Good build quality
  • Superb V12 engine and the last chance to get SL55 AMG
  • Beautiful hardtop convertible
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • More powerful drivetrain
  • Improvement in build quality
Cons
  • Obsession with AWD
  • I4 engine in an SL
  • Larger than before
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Less reliable V6 and V8 engines compared to the M112/M113 found in pre-facelift
  • 7G-Tronic is a downgrade
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some engine reliability concerns

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.