Compare Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232 vs Mercedes-Benz S-Class Cabriolet A217 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232

Mercedes-Benz S-Class Cabriolet A217 facelift

Mercedes-Benz SLK R172

Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232Mercedes-Benz S-Class Cabriolet A217 faceliftMercedes-Benz SLK R172
Variants
SL 55 4MATIC+
SL 63 4MATIC+
AMG S 63 4MATIC+
AMG S 65
S 560
SLK 55 AMG
SLK 200 MT
SLK 200
SLK 250 MT
SLK 250 CDI MT
SLK 250 CDI
SLK 350

Reviews

Neofiliac score88%94%81%
Pros
  • Rather good performance
  • Decent styling
  • Good handling
  • Good build quality
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Last chance to get V12 from Mercedes
  • Good interior design
  • Last opportunity to get naturally-aspirated V8 from Mercedes (M152)
  • SLK 350 got ride of the engine defect of its predecessor
  • Multi-link suspensions all around
Cons
  • Obsession with AWD
  • I4 engine in an SL
  • Larger than before
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Downgrade in styling with uglier grilles
  • Hot-V M176/M177 less reliable than the M156/M157
  • Generic styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.