Compare Mercedes-AMG SL R232 vs Jaguar XK X100 Convertible vs Jaguar XK X150 Convertible facelift

Variants
SL 55 4MATIC+
SL 63 4MATIC+
XK8 5AT
XK8 6AT
XKR 5AT
XKR 6AT
XK
XKR
XKR-S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
213 L / 7.5 cu-ft ~ 240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
200 L / 7.1 cu-ft ~ 313 L / 11.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
12.3 L / 13.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.2 L / 7.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
70.6 L / 18.7 gal
Passengers
4
4
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 390 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 360 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible
2-door Convertible

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
100 mm / 3.9 in
Size | Height
1306 mm / 51.4 in
Size | Length
4705 mm / 185.2 in
4760 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1915 mm / 75.4 in
1829 mm / 72.0 in
2028 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded) | 1892 mm / 74.5 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1504.0 mm / 59.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1498.0 mm / 59.0 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2588 mm / 101.9 in
2752 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
268 ~ 288 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
M 177
AJ133
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
8.6:1
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 243.0 cu-in / 3982.0 cc
5.0 L / 305.1 cu-in / 5000.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2021
2011 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
88%
82%
93%
Pros
  • Rather good performance
  • Decent styling
  • Good handling
  • Good build quality
  • Great elegance
  • Comfortable yet a little sporty
  • Good engine reliability
  • High interior quality
  • Superb supercharged engines
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Comfortable yet sporty
  • Better-looking than the coupe
Cons
  • Obsession with AWD
  • I4 engine in an SL
  • Larger than before
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Horrendous ZF 5HP transmission

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.