Compare Mercedes-AMG GT Roadster R190 vs Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232 vs Cadillac XLR

Mercedes-AMG GT Roadster R190

Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232

Cadillac XLR

Mercedes-AMG GT Roadster R190Mercedes-AMG SL-Class R232Cadillac XLR
Variants
GT
GT C
GT S
SL 55 4MATIC+
SL 63 4MATIC+
XLR
XLR-V

Reviews

Neofiliac score91%88%89%
Pros
  • Good performance overall
  • Relatively tight and light
  • Robust drivetrain
  • Rather good performance
  • Decent styling
  • Good handling
  • Good build quality
  • Wonderful styling
  • Hardtop convertible
  • As well built as any modern Cadillac
  • Rear-mounted transmission
Cons
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • Very little cargo space
  • Obsession with AWD
  • I4 engine in an SL
  • Larger than before
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.