Compare Audi TT FV facelift vs Audi TTS FV vs Audi S5 F5

Variants
40 TFSI
45 TFSI
45 TFSI MT
45 TFSI quattro
292PS 6DCT
306PS 7DCT
310PS 6MT
310PS 6DCT
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
4
4
Payload
360 kg / 794 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1353 mm / 53.3 in
1343 mm / 52.9 in
1368 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Length
4191 mm / 165.0 in
Size | Width
1832 mm / 72.1 in | 1966 mm / 77.4 in (mirror unfolded)
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1574.0 mm / 62.0 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheel Size
8J x 17
Wheelbase
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2505 mm / 98.6 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.1 cu-in / 1984.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed

Production

Availability
2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
49%
61%
60%
Pros
  • More muscular styling
  • Adequate performance
  • Decent styling
  • Lots of power
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • More balanced than Mk1
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring overall
  • Ugly, over-styled body
  • Questionable drivetrain reliability
  • Too much tech nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.