Compare Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift vs Volvo XC40 vs Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift

Volvo XC40

Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 faceliftVolvo XC40Mercedes-Benz EQA H243
Variants
AMG GLC 43
AMG GLC 63 S
AMG GLC 63
GLC 200
GLC 200d
GLC 220d
GLC 300
GLC 300d
GLC 300de
GLC 300e
GLC 400d
T4 Recharge
T5 Recharge
T2 MT
T2
T3 MT
T3 Euro6d MT
T3
D3 MT
D3
D3 AWD MT
D3 AWD
D4 AWD
T4
T4 AWD
T5 AWD
Recharge Pure Electric Single Motor
Recharge Pure Electric AWD Twin Motor
EQA 250
EQA 300 4MATIC
EQA 350 4MATIC+

Reviews

Neofiliac score63%32%26%
Pros
  • Available with V8 AMG engines
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 414km electric range
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 426km electric range
Cons
  • Ugly hunchback form factor falsely marketed as "Coupe"
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland and ugly
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.