Compare Mercedes GLC Coupe C253 facelift vs Nissan Rogue 2 vs Nissan Rogue
Variants
AMG GLC 43
AMG GLC 63 S
AMG GLC 63
GLC 200
GLC 200d
GLC 220d
GLC 300
GLC 300d
GLC 300de
GLC 300e
GLC 400d
2.0 AWD Hybrid CVT
2.0 Hybrid CVT
2.5 AWD CVT
2.5 CVT
AWD
AWD 2011+
FWD
FWD 2011+
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
17.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/70 R16, 225/60 R17, 225/55 R18
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
211 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Width
1839 mm / 72.4 in
1801 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17, 7.0J x 18
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.3 sec
Electric Range
45.0 km / 28.0 mi
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Towing Capacity
500 kg / 1102 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine
QR25DE
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Displacement
2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
68.3 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
100.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Torque
237 Nm / 174.8 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
CVT
Reviews
Neofiliac score
63%
37%
25%
Pros
- Available with V8 AMG engines
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Some offroad capabilities
- Improved styling
- Improved interior appointments
- Better appointed than the Qashqai
Cons
- Ugly hunchback form factor falsely marketed as "Coupe"
- Crossover nonsense
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Bad engine reputation
- Unreliable CVTs
- Poor handling
- MacPherson front suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.