Compare Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz EQA H243 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 facelift

Mercedes-Benz EQA H243

Mercedes-Benz GLA H247

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe C253 faceliftMercedes-Benz EQA H243Mercedes-Benz GLA H247
Variants
AMG GLC 43
AMG GLC 63 S
AMG GLC 63
GLC 200
GLC 200d
GLC 220d
GLC 300
GLC 300d
GLC 300de
GLC 300e
GLC 400d
EQA 250
EQA 300 4MATIC
EQA 350 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 35 4MATIC
AMG GLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG GLA 45 S 4MATIC+
GLA 180
GLA 180d
GLA 200
GLA 200 4MATIC
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC
GLA 220d
GLA 220d 4MATIC
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC
GLA 250e

Reviews

Neofiliac score63%26%32%
Pros
  • Available with V8 AMG engines
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Up to 426km electric range
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent interior quality
Cons
  • Ugly hunchback form factor falsely marketed as "Coupe"
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bland and ugly
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.