Compare Lamborghini Huracan vs Lamborghini Gallardo vs Lamborghini Murcielago
Variants
LP 620-2 MT
LP 610-2
LP 580-2
LP 610-4
LP 640-2 STO
LP 640-4
LP 640-4 Performante
Gallardo
Gallardo AT
Gallardo II
Gallardo II AT
LP 550-2
LP 550-2 Tricolore
LP 560-4
LP 560-4 AT
LP 570-4 Super Trofeo Stradale AT
LP 570-4 Superleggera
LP 570-4 Superleggera AT
Superleggera
Superleggera AT
LP 640-4
LP 640-4 AT
Murcielago
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
110 L / 3.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
22.0 L / 23.2 qt
21.0 L / 22.2 qt
15.0 L / 15.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.5 L / 7.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
Passengers
2
2
2
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1165 mm / 45.9 in
Size | Width
1900 mm / 74.8 in
Track Width | Front
1635.0 mm / 64.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1695.0 mm / 66.7 in
Wheel Size
19 in
Wheelbase
2620 mm / 103.1 in
2560 mm / 100.8 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
Performance
Braking | 200 km/h - 0
110.0 m / 360.8 ft
Powertrain
Engine
CSJ
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.7:1
Engine | Displacement
5.2 L / 317.6 cu-in / 5204.0 cc
Engine | Redline
8700 rpm
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V12 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
95%
85%
95%
Pros
- Great performance
- Decent reliability
- Up to awe-inspiring 640hp of power
- Up to glorious 8700rpm redline
- Iconic Lamborghini styling
- Superb V10 engine
- Manual transmission still available
- Rare RWD model in the LP 550-2
- Iconic styling improved
- Exceptional V12 engine
- Still available with manual
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- AWD only
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.