Compare Lamborghini Aventador vs McLaren F1 vs McLaren 720S Spider
Variants
Aventador LP 700-4
Aventador S LP 740-4
Aventador SuperVeloce LP 750-4
Aventador SVJ LP 770-4
Aventador LP 780-4 Ultimate
F1
F1 GT
F1 GTR
F1 LM
720S
765LT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
140 L / 4.9 cu-ft
150 L / 5.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
25.0 L / 26.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
3
2
Chassis
Offroad | Approach Angle
7.0 deg
6.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
10.5 deg
11.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.3 deg
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Convertible
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1136 mm / 44.7 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
Front wheel rims: 9J x 17 Rear wheel rims: 11.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.7 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.4 sec
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
30.0 m / 98.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
L539
BMW S70/2
Engine | Bore
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.8:1
Engine | Displacement
6.5 L / 396.5 cu-in / 6498.0 cc
6.1 L / 370.0 cu-in / 6064.0 cc
4.0 L / 243.7 cu-in / 3994.0 cc
Engine | Redline
8700 rpm
8500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
76.4 mm / 3.0 in
87.0 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
6-speed
7-speed
Transmission | Type
ISR automated manual
Manual
Automatic SSG
Reviews
Neofiliac score
94%
87%
87%
Pros
- Exceptional performance
- Improvement handling
- Superb NA V12 engineUp to glorious 8700rpm redline
- Superb handling characteristics
- Exclusivity
- Down to exceptional 2.8s 0-100kph time
- Sweet V8 engine
- Glorious 8500rpm redline
- Hard convertible top
- Still RWD
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- Somewhat conspicuous
- Not very beautiful
- Rather snobby connotations
- Lacks refinement
- Very difficult to maintain
- Awkward styling compared to the Italians
- Very little cargo space
- Reliability and build quality concerns
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.