HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Bugatti Chiron vs Jaguar F-Type vs Jaguar XK X100

Variants
Chiron
Chiron Sport
Chiron Super Sport
2.0 AT
3.0 340
3.0 340 AT
3.0 380
3.0 380 AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0 400 AT
3.0 400 AWD AT
F-Type R AT
F-Type R AWD AT
F-Type S
F-Type S AT
F-Type S AWD AT
F-Type SVR AWD AT
F-Type SVR AWD AT Euro6d
P300 AT
P340
P340 AT
P380
P380 AT
P380 AWD AT
XKR 5AT
XKR 6AT
XK8 5AT
XK8 6AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
327 L / 11.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
100.0 L / 26.4 gal
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
2
2
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
80 mm / 3.1 in
Size | Height
1212 mm / 47.7 in
Size | Length
4760 mm / 187.4 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1749.0 mm / 68.9 in
1504.0 mm / 59.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1498.0 mm / 59.0 in
Weight
1995.0 kg / 4398.2 lbs
Wheelbase
2711 mm / 106.7 in
2622 mm / 103.2 in
2588 mm / 101.9 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.0 m / 108.2 ft
Braking | 200 km/h - 0
124.0 m / 406.7 ft
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Mid-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
8.0 L / 487.8 cu-in / 7993.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7100 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Quad-turbocharged multi-port injected petrol W16 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic DSG
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
98%
80%
75%
Pros
  • Class-leading performance
  • Up to awe-inspiring 1600hp of power and tremendous 1600Nm of torque
  • Up to enjoyable 7100rpm redline
  • Sensuous styling
  • Exceptional interior
  • Sweet V8 engine
  • Decent reliability
  • Imposing styling
  • Superb elegance
  • Good interior fit and finish
  • Sweet engine performance
Cons
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Snobby marketing
  • Heavy
  • Less of elegance
  • Smaller than before
  • Smaller engines and AWD offered
  • Unreliable drivetrain
  • Horrible ZF 5HP transmission
  • Bad electrical problems

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.