Compare Nissan 370Z vs Alfa Romeo GT vs Alfa Romeo 4C
Variants
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU
1.8 TwinSpark
1.9 JTDm 150
2.0 JTS
2.0 JTS Selespeed
3.2
Euro 5
Euro 6
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 905 L / 32.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
4
2
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1183 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Length
3989 mm / 157.0 in
Track Width | Front
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2596 mm / 102.2 in
2380 mm / 93.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
CO2 Emission
157 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
258.0 km/h / 160.3 mph
Towing Capacity
1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Euro 6
Engine
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
81%
38%
78%
Pros
- Good handling characteristics
- Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
- Some reliability concerns
- Beautiful styling
- Characterful Twin Spark engine
- Superbly balanced
- Good suspension setup
- Sweet little engine
- Much more affordable than the 8C
Cons
- Low cargo capacity
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable reliability
- No powerful engine options
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.