Compare Nissan 370Z vs Subaru BRZ vs Nissan 370Z

Variants
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU
MT
AT
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
2
4
2

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Length
4240 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.28
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Euro 5
Engine
VQ37VHR
FA20D
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
7500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
205 Nm / 151.2 lb-ft @ 6400-6600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
81%
74%
81%
Pros
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
  • Some reliability concerns
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low center of gravity
  • Good balance
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
  • Some reliability concerns
Cons
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Down on engine power
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.