Compare Lotus Evora vs Subaru BRZ vs Mazda RX-8
Variants
Evora
Evora S
Evora S AT
Evora 400
Evora 400 AT
Evora Sport 410
Evora Sport 410 AT
Evora GT
Evora GT AT
Evora GT430 Sport
Evora GT430 Sport AT
MT
AT
Renesis 2003
40th Anniversary
Revolution High-Power
Challenge High-Power
Type S
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
160 L / 5.7 cu-ft
290 L / 10.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
8.7 L / 9.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
4
4
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.5 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Length
4240 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.30
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine
FA20D
13B
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
1.3 L / 79.8 cu-in / 1308.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
205 Nm / 151.2 lb-ft @ 6400-6600 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol rotary2 engine
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2012 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
85%
74%
84%
Pros
- Great performance
- Superb handling characteristics
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low center of gravity
- Good balance
- Compact engine and lightweight chassis
- Glorious 9000rpm redline
- Great weight distribution
- Double-wishbone + multilink suspension setup
- Great handling characteristics
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- Down on engine power
- MacPherson front suspension
- Low cargo capacity
- Not a thoroughbred
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.