Compare Lotus Evora vs Alfa Romeo GT vs Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione
Variants
Evora
Evora S
Evora S AT
Evora 400
Evora 400 AT
Evora Sport 410
Evora Sport 410 AT
Evora GT
Evora GT AT
Evora GT430 Sport
Evora GT430 Sport AT
1.8 TwinSpark
1.9 JTDm 150
2.0 JTS
2.0 JTS Selespeed
3.2
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
160 L / 5.7 cu-ft
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 905 L / 32.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
12.5 L / 13.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
Passengers
4
2
Payload
400 kg / 882 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.5 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
285/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1341 mm / 52.8 in
Size | Length
4381 mm / 172.5 in
Size | Width
1894 mm / 74.6 in
Track Width | Front
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2596 mm / 102.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
3.8 sec
Fuel Economy
15.8 L/100km / 14.9 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
306.0 km/h / 190.1 mph
Towing Capacity
1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Mid-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine
F136 YC
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
4.7 L / 286.3 cu-in / 4691.0 cc
Engine | Power
450.0 hp / 335.6 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
95.9 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
480 Nm / 354.0 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2010
2007 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
85%
38%
84%
Pros
- Great performance
- Superb handling characteristics
- Beautiful styling
- Characterful Twin Spark engine
- Superb drivetrain
- Great, sensual styling
- Sophisticated double-wishbone suspension setup
Cons
- Very little cargo space
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable reliability
- Expensive
- Very high fuel consumption
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.