Compare Aston Martin DB11 vs Aston Martin DB9
Variants
DB11 V8
DB11 V12
DB11 AMR
DB9
DB9 AT
DB9 2013
DB9 GT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
175 L / 6.2 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
10.4 L / 11.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
78.0 L / 20.6 gal
Passengers
4
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Wheel Size
9J x 20, 11.0J x 20
Wheelbase
2805 mm / 110.4 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
333 g/km
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
5.9 L / 362.2 cu-in / 5935.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7200 rpm
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
87%
Pros
- Good performance
- Up to enjoyable 7200rpm redline
- Wide customizability
- Luxury features
- Great styling
- New, elegant interior
- Characterful V12 engine
- Available with manual transmission
Cons
- Somewhat uglier than the DB9
- Reliability concerns
- Unreliable engine
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.