Compare Cadillac ATS Coupe vs Infiniti G35 Coupe vs Infiniti Q60 II
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD
3.6 AT
3.6 AWD AT
ATS-V
ATS-V AT
MT
AT
2.0t
2.0t AWD
3.0t
3.0t AWD
3.0t Euro6
3.0t Euro6 AWD
3.0t Red Sport 400
3.0t Red Sport 400 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
295 L / 10.4 cu-ft
211 L / 7.5 cu-ft
246 L / 8.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.0 L / 9.5 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
4
5
4
Payload
378 kg / 833 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/50 R17
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1392 mm / 54.8 in
Size | Length
4628 mm / 182.2 in
4684 mm / 184.4 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in
1816 mm / 71.5 in
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1534.0 mm / 60.4 in
Weight
1600.0 kg / 3527.4 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in
Wheelbase
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Top Speed
298.0 km/h / 185.2 mph
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
Engine | Power
283.0 hp / 211.0 kW @ 6200 rpm
Engine | Redline
6800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
80.9 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
366 Nm / 269.9 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2003 ~ 2008
Reviews
Neofiliac score
69%
61%
80%
Pros
- Decent performance
- Up to enjoyable 7200rpm redline
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Good styling
- Reliable drivetrain
- Clean, simple styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Beautiful, upscale styling
- Good handling characteristics
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Very tight inside
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low cargo capacity
- Low cargo capacity
- Drivetrain reliability concerns
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.