Compare Audi Q3 F3 vs Nissan Murano 3 vs Nissan Juke 2

Variants
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
2.5 Hybrid AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD
1.0 Euro6d
1.0 Euro6d DCT
1.0
1.0 DCT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
15.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.6 deg
24.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
235/65 R18, 235/55 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.6 m / 34.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
175 mm / 6.9 in
Size | Height
1595 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4897 mm / 192.8 in
4210 mm / 165.7 in
Size | Width
1915 mm / 75.4 in
Track Width | Front
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1641.0 mm / 64.6 in
Wheelbase
2680 mm / 105.5 in
2824 mm / 111.2 in
2636 mm / 103.8 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.9 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.31
Electric Range
61.0 km / 37.9 mi
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Towing Capacity
680 kg / 1499 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
HR10DDT
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6600 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Type
CVT

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
24%
2%
Pros
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Cheap to buy
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Poor CVT
  • Low build quality
  • Extremely ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor build quality
  • Worse than Qashqai

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.