Compare Toyota C-HR facelift vs Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota Venza (AV10)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota Venza (AV10)

Toyota C-HR faceliftToyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota Venza (AV10)
Variants
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.7
2.7 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
3.5
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD
3.5 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%42%24%
Pros
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Rather good exterior design (for what it is)
  • Exceptionally reliable powertrain
  • Great fit and finish
Cons
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Half crossover, half station wagon

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.